<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When the talking heads start talking, I tune out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://frontporchexpressions.com/2009/06/26/when-the-talking-heads-talk-i-tune-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://frontporchexpressions.com/2009/06/26/when-the-talking-heads-talk-i-tune-out/</link>
	<description>Front Porch Expressions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:45:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan-O</title>
		<link>http://frontporchexpressions.com/2009/06/26/when-the-talking-heads-talk-i-tune-out/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan-O]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 16:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontporchexpressions.com/2009/06/26/when-the-talking-heads-talk-i-tune-out/#comment-127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I wasn&#039;t what you&#039;d call a fan of MJ, not that genre of pop music. But I have to give credit for his talent. And as I have come to understand more of his history and original family life, I begin to understand his behavior better. As a one-time cop and insurance investigator, I do have an interest in charges leveled at high-profile people. I have come to the conclusion that charges leveled against MJ were the result of greedy, opportunistic bottom feeders. I have come to believe that he did no wrong. He is clearly a case of arrested development, wanting to be the child he was never allowed to be. 

I still prefer BB King and Muddy Waters.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I wasn&#8217;t what you&#8217;d call a fan of MJ, not that genre of pop music. But I have to give credit for his talent. And as I have come to understand more of his history and original family life, I begin to understand his behavior better. As a one-time cop and insurance investigator, I do have an interest in charges leveled at high-profile people. I have come to the conclusion that charges leveled against MJ were the result of greedy, opportunistic bottom feeders. I have come to believe that he did no wrong. He is clearly a case of arrested development, wanting to be the child he was never allowed to be. </p>
<p>I still prefer BB King and Muddy Waters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coop</title>
		<link>http://frontporchexpressions.com/2009/06/26/when-the-talking-heads-talk-i-tune-out/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coop]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 16:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontporchexpressions.com/2009/06/26/when-the-talking-heads-talk-i-tune-out/#comment-120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was amazed on Thursday of the coverage of Jackson&#039;s death. Yes, a pop icon. Yes, a great musician. But worthy of wall-to-wall coverage by the cable news channels? Well, it might have been a slow news day to some degree.

I marveled at the helicopter shot of the UCLA Medical Center... a few cars coming and going, cones being placed on the street, 6 (count &#039;em - 6) LAPD black-and-whites- parked at the entrance, with one changing position every ten minutes. All makes for compelling viewing.

Phil, you&#039;re right. There are bigger fish to fry than Michael Jackson. In light of the coverage of Jackson, I wonder how the media will handle the upcoming death of Walter Cronkite. Do ya think radio stations will convert to classical music and TV will air 4 days of a Cronkite retrospect? (Younger readers won&#039;t understand my last sentence.)

Dave]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was amazed on Thursday of the coverage of Jackson&#8217;s death. Yes, a pop icon. Yes, a great musician. But worthy of wall-to-wall coverage by the cable news channels? Well, it might have been a slow news day to some degree.</p>
<p>I marveled at the helicopter shot of the UCLA Medical Center&#8230; a few cars coming and going, cones being placed on the street, 6 (count &#8216;em &#8211; 6) LAPD black-and-whites- parked at the entrance, with one changing position every ten minutes. All makes for compelling viewing.</p>
<p>Phil, you&#8217;re right. There are bigger fish to fry than Michael Jackson. In light of the coverage of Jackson, I wonder how the media will handle the upcoming death of Walter Cronkite. Do ya think radio stations will convert to classical music and TV will air 4 days of a Cronkite retrospect? (Younger readers won&#8217;t understand my last sentence.)</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

